
How useful is Graham's number? | Science Questions
Aug 8, 2023 · Tony - Graham's number, for a time, was the largest number ever to have appeared in a mathematical proof. It's named after Ron Graham, who is an American mathematician. He …
Graham's Number : Why so big? - Mathematics Stack Exchange
Jun 26, 2012 · Can someone give me an idea of how R.Graham reached Graham's Number as an upper bound on the solution of the related problem ? Thanks !
Is there a way of intuitively grasping the magnitude of Graham's …
I have heard it stated before that Graham's number is so vast that it is completely beyond comprehension. It is way larger than the number of atoms in the universe, so cannot be …
How do I write Grahams number - Mathematics Stack Exchange
Apr 26, 2021 · The size difference between Graham's number and what you suggest is almost exactly Graham's number.
What is larger? Graham's number or Googolplexian?
Dec 18, 2016 · Graham's number is much much bigger. As in, take 3^3^3^3^... for the rest of your life, and you aren't even remotely close in any sense.
Graham's number - Mathematics Stack Exchange
May 15, 2019 · Coming up with the number was not the hard part, but comparing it with Graham's number turned out to be really hard. So the number is the following, imagine 'the largest …
Is this the correct way to compute the last $n$ digits of Graham's …
For the following question, all what is needed to know about Graham's number is that it is a power tower with many many many $3's$ Consider the following pseudocode :
hyperoperation - Question about $TREE (3)$ and Graham's …
Aug 13, 2018 · Sidenote: this is likely much smaller than $\operatorname {TREE} (3)$ for the same reason as your previous question.
How Big would "Graham's Tree" be? - Mathematics Stack Exchange
May 21, 2017 · What if in Graham’s Number every “3” was replaced by “tree(3)” instead? How big is this number? Greater than Rayo’s number? Greater than every current named number?
How do we compare the size of numbers that are around the size …
Jan 7, 2016 · It appears obvious (I think) that Graham's number is indeed larger, but how does one go about proving that if both numbers are "so large" that they become hard to compare?