"To decide not to return them, or to put it off to an indefinite future time with human missions would be to take a major ...

The bad part in Trump’s budget is the near total evisceration of NASA’s science programs, both on Earth and in space. The ...

The NEO Surveyor mission is the first space telescope that'll be dedicated to locating asteroids that could threaten Earth, ...

The administration’s proposed 2026 budget portends a future where science is no longer a national priority — but an ...

The project cancellation comes after NASA has already invested 15 years and $3.4 billion in the telescope, which is 90% complete.

Japan is ready to support the United States' lower-cost lunar missions, its space agency chief said, after the US ...

Will the US President take credit for that one as well? NASA was already considering reducing crew size on the International ...

The White House released its budget proposal for fiscal year 2026, and one of the biggest surprises therein was a 24% cut in NASA funding, which would fall from $24.8 billion this year to $18.8 ...

The US House Committee on Space, Science, and Technology has expressed concerns over President Donald Trump's plan to cut the ...

While specific agency-level proposals haven’t been released ... One of the only areas to seek a bump in Trump’s NASA budget is human space exploration efforts, which would see a $647 million ...

That said, however, he contends the Trump budget for NASA as it now stands is already moving to wreck the first two stages of the plan by trying to wreck NASA's Mars Exploration Program.

The so-called “skinny” version of the federal budget proposal was released recently. The NASA portion is causing angst and consternation, Here are the good, the bad and the ugly parts. The good part ...