We recently wrote on strategies for effectively cross-examining expert witnesses, noting that litigators can make good use of deposition time by exploring in detail the facts supporting the expert’s ...

The purpose of cross-examination is to continue to argue — and defend — your case by using leading questions to obtain affirmative answers. The leading question with the desired answer is the key to ...

In their Trial Advocacy column, Ben Rubinowitz and Evan Torgan review certain time-tested trial techniques that can be used by attorneys to cross-examine an expert regardless of his field of expertise ...

Estate litigation rarely turns on a single moment, but an effective cross‑examination of the other side’s forensic document examiner may be one’s best shot at that “Perry Mason moment.” When a will’s ...

General James "Mad Dog" Mattis famously told his troops, "Be polite and be professional, but have a plan to kill everybody you meet." Attorneys cross-examining experts would be well advised to adopt ...

The use of expert witnesses in patent cases, and the emphasis put on them, varies between jurisdictions and even judges. What reforms are needed? Cross-examination of expert witnesses by counsel at ...

Crime Karen Read trial: Digital expert’s credentials, methodology questioned during defense’s cross Defense attorney Robert Alessi began his cross-examination of Aperture LLC expert Shanon Burgess by ...

Marijn van der Wal of Bird & Bird says a landmark Unified Patent Court case highlights the potential of expert witnesses to enhance patent litigation and shape procedural practices in Europe The ...