I was deeply disturbed by your Sunday article on Senate Bill 239, the Death With Dignity Act passed by the Nevada Senate. You quote the group Compassion and Choices regarding the fact that there has ...
As a retired professor of ethics, I applauded the Tribune editorial board’s recent call for the abolition of Utah’s death penalty. The day after the editorial appeared, Utah’s parole board predictably ...
I respect the right of others to disagree with me. My research as a scholar of rhetoric is anchored to the idea that argument is both a way of knowing and a productive tool for persuasion. As a ...
As someone who lives in the neighborhood, I am not excited about a (cannabis) dispensary coming in. Yet I feel the argument of being near schools ridiculous; dispensaries are vigilant in who they let ...
In response to a recent letter defending “woke,” I would like to respond. Wokeism supports the belief that men can become pregnant. It supports a nominee to the Supreme Court who cannot define what a ...
Regarding your editorial: “ A pistol ban on campuses,” this was a textbook example of a straw-man argument. The ideas of “a pistol in every pocket” and untrained civilians responding to crimes were ...
Yet another splinter in the plank of woke, leftist theory: the cultural assertion that men can become pregnant, that “woman” cannot be clearly defined and that children have the emotional maturity to ...
The editorial about women having fewer children is shameful (“Should we worry about American women having fewer kids?” May 4). There is a pathetic patronizing attempt to walk the misogynistic message ...
As a retired teacher I am always confused when people attempt to make quantitative arguments but start with incorrect numbers. The recent letter questioning the emissions of EVs is an excellent ...
You are able to gift 5 more articles this month. Anyone can access the link you share with no account required. Learn more. This is in response to the Oct. 12 letter from the gentleman from ...
To Rep. Marie Gluesenkamp Perez: Ma’am, I received your form letter defending your vote in favor of the SAVE Act as an effort to further election security. Your argument was nonsense. Our election ...
Some results have been hidden because they may be inaccessible to you
Show inaccessible results