Supreme Court Case That Could Gut Planned Parenthood
Digest more
Top News
Overview
Impacts
McMaster explained that because money is fungible, the use of Medicaid funds by abortion clinics “results in the subsidy of abortion and the denial of the right to life.”
From SCOTUSblog
The U.S. Supreme Court is set on Wednesday to consider South Carolina's bid to strip Planned Parenthood of funding under the Medicaid program in a case that could bolster efforts by Republican-led sta...
From U.S. News & World Report
Low-income patients who go there for things like contraception, cancer screenings and pregnancy testing could see their care upended if the court sides with South Carolina leaders who say no public mo...
From The Washington Post
Read more on News Digest
In opposing the case, the state of South Carolina has argued that Edwards didn’t have a right to sue in federal court. The lower courts sided with Edwards and Planned Parenthood—as have most federal circuit courts that have considered similar cases. So South Carolina appealed, all the way up to the Supreme Court.
The U.S. Supreme Court is set on Wednesday to consider South Carolina's bid to strip Planned Parenthood of funding under the Medicaid program in a case that could bolster efforts by Republican-led states to deprive the reproductive healthcare and abortion provider of public money.
Supporters of Planned Parenthood argue the state violated the Medicare and Medicaid Act of 1965, which states beneficiaries “may obtain” medical treatment from any qualified provider.
The U.S. Supreme Court on April 2 will hear oral arguments in a case that involves Medicaid coverage for participants in South Carolina. Here's what's at stake.
The battle over taxpayer funding for Planned Parenthood takes center stage at the Supreme Court in a South Carolina dispute over Medicaid providers.